The following quotes are taken from evilbible.com:
Sunday, September 21, 2014
The following quotes are taken from evilbible.com:
"Jesus Lied About Prayer - "Jesus is quoted many times in the Bible saying that a believer can ask for anything through prayer and receive it. He even goes so far as to say that mountains and trees can be thrown into the sea simply by praying for it. This is clearly a lie, and can be proven to be a lie by any believer. Simply pray for me to be converted to Christianity right away. Or better yet ask God to move the mountains behind my house. He could make a lot of converts that way. If I’m converted today, I’ll post a public apology on my web site and devote my life to kissing God’s a--. If I’m not converted it would only be fair for you to apologize and devote your life to kissing my butt.
Here are the quotes from Jesus that proves that he lied:
1) "And Jesus answered and said to them, 'Truly I say to you, if you have faith and do not doubt, you will not only do what was done to the fig tree, but even if you say to this mountain, `Be taken up and cast into the sea,' it will happen. "And all things you ask in prayer, believing, you will receive." (Matthew 21:21-22 NAS)
2) "Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks, receives; and the one who seeks, finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened." (Matthew 7:7-8 NAB)
3) "Again I say to you, that if two of you agree on earth about anything that they may ask, it shall be done for them by My Father who is in heaven. For where two or three have gathered together in My name, I am there in their midst." (Matthew 18:19-20 NAS)
4) "Amen, I say to you, whoever says to this mountain, 'Be lifted up and thrown into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it shall be done for him. Therefore I tell you, all that you ask for in prayer, believe that you will receive it and it shall be yours." (Mark 11:23-24 NAB)
5) "And I tell you, ask and you will receive; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks, receives; and the one who seeks, finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened." (Luke 11:9-10 NAB)
6) "And whatever you ask in my name, I will do, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If you ask anything of me in my name, I will do it." (John 14:13-14 NAB)
7) "If you remain in me and my words remain in you, ask for whatever you want and it will be done for you." (John 15:7 NAB)
8) "It was not you who chose me, but I who chose you and appointed you to go and bear fruit that will remain, so that whatever you ask the Father in my name he may give you." (John 15:16 NAB)
9) "On that day you will not question me about anything. Amen, amen, I say to you, whatever you ask the Father in my name he will give you. Until now you have not asked anything in my name; ask and you will receive, so that your joy may be complete." (John 16:23-24 NAB)
A lot of Christians ignore what Jesus actually says in the Bible. They also tend to add things to the actual words to make them say something else. If you honestly and truthfully read these quotes, without adding to them, it is very easy to see that Jesus is not saying that God will think about your prayers. He says God will grant all your prayers. Clearly, God doesn’t grant all prayers and this proves that Jesus was a habitual liar."
Was Jesus a liar? Let's examine each of these quotes in context.
1., 4. Matthew 21:21-22; Mark 11:23-24: Jesus often spoke to his disciples in parables, and told them flat out that he was speaking to them figuratively - using metaphors (see John 16:25). In other words, when Jesus spoke of a mountain being thrown into the sea, he wasn't talking about a mountain literally being thrown into a sea. It was a metaphor for faith in God to overcome major obstacles in life.
2., 5. Matthew 7:7-8; Luke 11:9-10: Jesus was talking about something very specific in this passage - the Holy Spirit. A few verses later, as he was elaborating on his "Ask and it will be given to you" statement, he said the following: "If you then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!” (Luke 11:13, NIV). Taken in context, Jesus was talking about his followers asking God to give them the Holy Spirit.
3. Matthew 18:19-20: Again, this is another quote that is taken out of context. These verses are part of a larger passage where Jesus was talking about dealing with sin in the church.
The full passage can be read here:
6., 7., 8.: In John chapters 14 and 15, Jesus was about to be crucified, and was speaking to his disciples one last time. It is important to notice the verse just before the promise is first given: "Very truly I tell you, whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things than these, because I am going to the Father" (John 14:12, NIV). In response to Philip's request to show them the Father (John 14:8), Jesus emphasized that "anyone who has seen me has seen the Father" (John 14:9, NIV). He further stated that since he was returning to the Father, his disciples would now be on earth acting as his representatives. That being the case, the phrase "ask in my name" means asking the Father as a representative of Jesus, who always prayed that God's will would be done (Luke 22:42). John elaborates on this point in a later letter: "This is the confidence we have in approaching God: that if we ask anything according to his will, he hears us. And if we know that he hears us - whatever we ask - we know that we have what we asked of him" (1 John 5:14-15, NIV).
9. John 16:23-24: This is another snippet of a much larger passage where Jesus was about to be crucified, and was speaking to his disciples one last time. Jesus was responding to the disciples' question about what he meant when he said that he was leaving and returning to the Father. He responded by explaining that he had been speaking figuratively to them (using metaphors - in other words, not to be taken literally), but when he returned they would no longer need to ask him for clarification; they would receive wisdom and clarity directly from God the Father in Jesus' name. "Though I have been speaking figuratively, a time is coming when I will no longer use this kind of language but will tell you plainly about my Father. In that day you will ask in my name. I am not saying that I will ask the Father on your behalf. No, the Father himself loves you because you have loved me and have believed that I came from God. I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father” (John 16:25-28, NIV).
You can read the full text of John chapter 16 at this link:
In conclusion, these statements of Jesus were not meant to be taken as a blanket promise that we could ask for whatever we want and immediately receive it. Taken in context, many of these verses were speaking of other things entirely. It is also important to understand that God has given each person a choice regarding their own salvation, and that each person must choose for themselves what to believe. No one can choose for them, and no one can override their decision. "He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God - children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God" (John 1:11-13, NIV).
Monday, August 11, 2014
The following quotes are taken from evilbible.com:
"You would think that Jesus and the New Testament would have a different view of slavery, but slavery is still approved of in the New Testament, as the following passages show."
"Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ." (Ephesians 6:5 NLT)
"Christians who are slaves should give their masters full respect so that the name of God and his teaching will not be shamed. If your master is a Christian, that is no excuse for being disrespectful. You should work all the harder because you are helping another believer by your efforts. Teach these truths, Timothy, and encourage everyone to obey them." (1 Timothy 6:1-2 NLT)
"In the following parable, Jesus clearly approves of beating slaves even if they didn't know they were doing anything wrong."
"The servant will be severely punished, for though he knew his duty, he refused to do it. But people who are not aware that they are doing wrong will be punished only lightly. Much is required from those to whom much is given, and much more is required from those to whom much more is given." (Luke 12:47-48 NLT)
The passage in the gospel of Luke quoted above is a parable. Jesus was comparing our relationship with God to that of a master and servant. He was exhorting his followers to keep watch in his absence, because he was about to be crucified, resurrected and then ascend to heaven until his second coming. In his absence, those who follow him must take care to act appropriately. "Who then is the faithful and wise manager, whom the master puts in charge of his servants to give them their food allowance at the proper time? It will be good for that servant whom the master finds doing so when he returns. Truly I tell you, he will put him in charge of all his possessions. But suppose the servant says to himself, ‘My master is taking a long time in coming,’ and he then begins to beat the other servants, both men and women, and to eat and drink and get drunk. The master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he is not aware of. He will cut him to pieces and assign him a place with the unbelievers" (Luke 12:42-46, NIV). Jesus had a stern warning for those who deliberately disobey him, and he used a parable that his audience would have been familiar with - the relationship between a master and slave. Wise and prudent behavior was rewarded, while lazy and abusive behavior was punished.
Slavery was still common practice during the Roman Empire, when Jesus lived on earth. Slaves were either prisoners of war or, as during the time period when the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) was written, were those who were poor and in debt, who had voluntarily sold themselves and their children into slavery in order to survive. Slavery was a reality at the time the Bible was written. However, there are no statements in the Bible that praise slavery or encourage people to own slaves. Rather, most of the verses in the Bible that mention slavery are statements regarding how slaves were supposed to be treated. Just as the verses above exhort Christian slaves to be faithful and honest while working, masters were directed to be good to their slaves. "And masters, treat your slaves in the same way. Do not threaten them, since you know that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven, and there is no favoritism with him" (Ephesians 6:9, NIV).
"Why was slavery allowed in the New Testament?"
Tuesday, June 24, 2014
The following quote is taken from evilbible.com:
"What does the Bible say about beating slaves? It says you can beat both male and female slaves with a rod so hard that as long as they don't die right away you are cleared of any wrong doing."
"When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property." (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)
A great deal of Exodus chapter 21 concerns the treatment of slaves. You can read the entire chapter here:
Like most other passages in this section, these verses must be taken in a cultural and historical context. In the Ancient Near East and many other ancient cultures for thousands of years, slavery was standard practice. So too was corporal punishment. Even up until a few generations ago, corporal punishment was a major method of discipline, especially for parents disciplining their children. The Bible clearly states that in some instances, physical punishment is the only proper mode of discipline, particularly with a child who has repeatedly and deliberately disobeyed (2 Samuel 7:14, Proverbs 13:24, 22:15, 23:13-14). However, this does not give the parent or master free reign to abuse their child or slave. There are clear restrictions in place. "Parents, do not exasperate your children; instead, bring them up in the training and instruction of the Lord" (Ephesians 6:4, NIV).
Exodus 21:20-21 concerns a situation in which a slave dies as a direct result of a beating received. The NAB translation of verse 21 given above makes it seem as if the slave died a day or two after being beaten. However, the actual translation makes it clear that in the instance of the second half of the passage in question, the slave survived the beating and recovered after a day or two:
"...but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property." (Exodus 21:21, NIV translation)
"But if the slave recovers within a day or two, then the owner shall not be punished, since the slave is his property." (Exodus 21:21, NLT translation)
Killing a slave was considered as serious a crime as killing a free person, and it was forbidden. Slaves are made in the image of God, just as free people are: "Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind" (Genesis 9:6, NIV). If a slave died as a direct result of a beating, whether instantly or days later, the slave owner had to be punished for murder.
This brings us to the main question: Why was the slave owner not punished for beating the slave, and why was the slave referred to as property? Again, we must remember that the slave owner was not punished for beating the slave because physical punishment was a standard mode of discipline in the Ancient Near East, and universally practiced. However, if the slave owner caused the slave permanent injury, by law the slave had to be set free as compensation (Exodus 21:26-27).
In terms of the slave being referred to as "property", the Hebrew root word used here is keceph, which literally translates as "money". In the verse just previous to this one, if a free person injured another free person, the guilty party had to pay the injured person for any loss of time. In this instance, since the loss of time involved in the slave's injury and recovery was costing the slave's owner money due to loss of productivity, there was no exchange of money involved. In this passage, then, the slave is not actually considered "property" by God. The slave's services are what made the slave owner money, and a loss of a slave's services for a time meant a loss of money for the slave owner.
Slavery was - and is - not an ideal condition, nor is it commended by God. This is why most of the passages in the Bible referring to slavery are laws regarding their treatment. Slaves were human beings created in the image of God just as free people were, and their mistreatment was forbidden.
"Exodus 21: Does God approve of slavery?"
Tuesday, May 6, 2014
The following quote is taken from evilbible.com:
"If you buy a Hebrew slave, he is to serve for only six years. Set him free in the seventh year, and he will owe you nothing for his freedom. If he was single when he became your slave and then married afterward, only he will go free in the seventh year. But if he was married before he became a slave, then his wife will be freed with him. If his master gave him a wife while he was a slave, and they had sons or daughters, then the man will be free in the seventh year, but his wife and children will still belong to his master. But the slave may plainly declare, 'I love my master, my wife, and my children. I would rather not go free.' If he does this, his master must present him before God. Then his master must take him to the door and publicly pierce his ear with an awl. After that, the slave will belong to his master forever." (Exodus 21:2-6 NLT)
Notice how they can get a male Hebrew slave to become a permanent slave by keeping his wife and children hostage until he says he wants to become a permanent slave. What kind of family values are these?"
A great deal of Exodus chapter 21 concerns the treatment of slaves. You can read the entire chapter here:
In the Ancient Near East, the class system was very different from most cultures today. Many people, when becoming poor, destitute, or overly in debt, would have to sell themselves and their children into slavery in order to survive . With this in mind, part of the Law concerned the fair treatment of slaves. For example, a Hebrew who sold himself into slavery to another Hebrew could not be enslaved for more than 6 years (Exodus 21:2).
In this passage we see the specific situation of a married Hebrew man who became a slave. The Law protected a married couple who went into slavery together - they could not be broken apart. If the man was married when he became a slave, he and his wife would be purchased by the same master, serve in the same household and be freed together at the end of six years (verse 3).
However, the situation of a man who chose to marry a woman of his master's household, whether another slave or perhaps even a relative of the slave owner (the text does not specify, but it would seem more likely that the woman was a fellow slave), was different. A Hebrew male slave was fully aware of his situation - he was going to be a slave for no more than 6 years. Therefore, any ties he made to the members of his master's household, whether by marriage or otherwise, would end after that time period. A slave who married another slave of the household during his period of service would be fully aware of the fact that his new wife and any children they bore together would not be able to leave together at the end of his service. With this in mind, it would not seem to be an advisable situation to marry during that time period.
We must keep in mind that this must have been a rather unusual and unlikely situation - the woman in question, if she was a Hebrew slave, would also be set free at the end of six years (Deuteronomy 15:12). If she and her children had to stay with their master when the man was freed after six years, it was either because she was not Hebrew (foreign women could be enslaved for life, though it wasn't a requirement - see Leviticus 25:45-46), she was a permanent member of the master's household, such as a daughter, sister, niece, etc., or she had already made the decision to permanently stay with her master and be his slave for life. Male and female Hebrew slaves could voluntarily decide to become permanent slaves if they found that they were in a better situation with their masters than they had been on their own: "But if your servant says to you, 'I do not want to leave you,' because he loves you and your family and is well off with you, then take an awl and push it through his earlobe into the door, and he will become your servant for life. Do the same for your female servant" (Deuteronomy 15:16-17, NIV).
In conclusion, the situation mentioned in Exodus 21:2-6 was an avoidable one. If a Hebrew man chose to marry a permanent slave of the household while he was in service, they both knew what they were getting into. In that instance, it would seem that in choosing marriage in the master's household, the man was almost certainly choosing to bind himself to his master's household for life, as well as to his wife.
 Life and Society in the West: Antiquity and the Middle Ages, Constance Brittain Bouchard, 1988. Pg. 33.
 A History of the Ancient World (Fourth Edition), Chester G. Starr, 1991. Pg. 43.
 Life In The Ancient Near East, Daniel C. Snell, 1997. Pg. 35-36.
Sunday, April 6, 2014
With Easter approaching, I wanted to revisit a topic that I continue to see resurfacing, mostly on Facebook and Internet message boards. A popular modern theory is that, quite simply, Jesus never existed, and that there is little to no evidence outside of the Bible that points to a man named Jesus of Nazareth. Is this claim actually true?
First, let's look at the extra-Biblical evidence for Jesus. The following documents testify to the existence of a man named Jesus of Nazareth (sometimes the Romans called him "Christus" or "Chrestus"), and all of them were written within 100 years of the time period he was said to have lived in (circa 6 BCE - 30 CE):
Tacitus, a first century Roman historian (who lived circa 56-117 CE), mentioned a man called "Christus" being executed during the reign of Emperor Tiberius (reigned 14-37 CE), and Emperor Nero's persecution of Christians in 64 CE: "Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired." 
Suetonius, another first century Roman historian (who lived circa 69-122 CE), also mentioned Christians being punished by Emperor Nero . He also mentioned a man named "Chrestus", in his account of the life of Emperor Claudius (reigned 41-54 CE): "Since the Jews constantly made disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus, he expelled them from Rome". 
Josephus, a Jewish historian (who lived circa 37-100 CE), mentioned Jesus, James and John the Baptist in Antiquities. His main passage about Jesus has been disputed, due to doubt over whether or not some of the phrases in the passage were added at a later date. The following is the paragraph, with what is commonly believed to be additions by a later Christian translator in brackets: “At this time there appeared Jesus, a wise man [if indeed one ought to refer to him as a man]. For he was a doer of startling deeds, a teacher of people who received the truth with pleasure. And he gained a following both among many Jews and among many of Greek origin. [He was the Messiah-Christ.] And when Pilate, because of an accusation made by the leading men among us, condemned him to the cross, those who had loved him previously did not cease to do so. [For on the third day he appeared to them again alive, just as the divine prophets had spoken about these and countless other marvelous things about him.] And up until this very day the tribe of Christians, named after him, has not died out.”  Later, Josephus describes the death of Jesus' brother, James: “But this younger Ananus, who, as we told you already, took the high priesthood, was a bold man in his temper, and very insolent. He assembled the Sanhedrin of judges, and brought before them the brother of Jesus the so-called Messiah-Christ, whose name was James, and some others. When he had formed an accusation against them as breakers of the law, he delivered them over to be stoned.” 
Pliny the Younger (who lived circa 61-112 CE), was a magistrate of Rome during the late first and early second century. He wrote a series of letters to Emperor Trajan. One of them concerned what should be done with the Christians he arrested: "They also declared that the sum total of their guilt or error amounted to no more than this: they had met regularly before dawn on a fixed day to chant verses alternately amongst themselves in honor of Christ as if to a god, and also to bind themselves by oath, not for any criminal purpose, but to abstain from theft, robbery and adultery." 
Mara bar Serapion was an Assyrian Stoic philosopher, who wrote one letter to his son which has survived. Most scholars date this letter to being composed shortly after 73 CE (Mara was taken captive circa 72 CE by the Romans). He wrote the following passage in his letter: "What else can we say, when the wise are forcibly dragged off by tyrants, their wisdom is captured by insults, and their minds are oppressed and without defense? What advantage did the Athenians gain from murdering Socrates? Famine and plague came upon them as a punishment for their crime. What advantage did the men of Samos gain from burning Pythagoras? In a moment their land was covered with sand. What advantage did the Jews gain from executing their wise king? It was just after that their kingdom was abolished. God justly avenged these three wise men: the Athenians died of hunger; the Samians were overwhelmed by the sea and the Jews, desolate and driven from their own kingdom, live in complete dispersion. But Socrates is not dead, because of Plato; neither is Pythagoras, because of the statue of Juno; nor is the wise king, because of the 'new law' he laid down."  Some scholars see the reference to the "wise king" as an early non-Christian reference to Jesus.
A common response when these extra-Biblical references are presented is as follows: "These documents were written between 40-90 years after the death of Jesus, so they can't be considered valid references". Actually, the fact that anything was written about Jesus within a century of his death is unusual, considering that in the ancient world, biographies and histories were often not written about a person or event for at least a couple of centuries. For example, Alexander the Great lived circa 356-323 BCE, but his earliest biography was not written until the first century BCE, leaving a gap of 300 years . The biography and sayings of Buddha were not written until the first century CE, over 400 years after his death . To have multiple sources mentioning the same relatively obscure person within the time frame of a century after his death was not common.
In terms of the Biblical evidence for Jesus' existence, we have the four Gospels, written by eyewitnesses and their companions, which all tell the story of Jesus, his life and teachings, and his death and resurrection. The letters of early church fathers (such as Papias, Polycarp and a document known as the Didache), written between 95-150 CE, quoted extensively from all four of the Gospels and said that they contained the words of Jesus. We also have an early fragment of John's Gospel (known as Papyrus P52), dated roughly to the first half of the second century CE. The four Gospels were in circulation and being quoted by 100 CE, which means that they were written within 70 years of the death and resurrection of Jesus (which occurred circa 30 CE). In addition, we have the letters of Paul, Peter and James, who all were martyred prior to 67 CE. All of these letters testified to the existence of Jesus and his death and resurrection, and all were written within 40 years of the events.
In conclusion, the claim that Jesus never existed is not sound. There are simply too many sources that were written within a century after his lifetime to attest to his existence.
 Tacitus, Annals 15.44 (written circa 116 CE), translated by Church and Brodribb
 Suetonius, Life of Nero 16.2 (writen circa 121 CE)
 Suetonius, Life of Claudius 25.4 (written circa 121 CE)
 Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, 18.63-64 (written circa 93-94 CE)
 Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, 20.200 (written circa 93-94 CE)
 Pliny the Younger, Letters, 10.96 (written circa 111 CE)
 Mara ben Serapion, The Epistle
 "Diodorus Siculus", http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Diodorus_Siculus/Introduction*.html